Draft a project writes a first draft of the project narrative (memoria técnica) against the scoring criteria of whichever call for applications (convocatoria) you choose. It isn't a generic text: whoever scores a narrative fills in a sheet with the criteria from the rules and looks for each one separately, so the draft shares out the space according to what each criterion is worth.
What you need
- A call whose rules we've read. The dropdown only shows the ones you're managing or have saved that have criteria: with no criteria there'd be nothing to write against.
- Your organisation's profile filled in: that's where the mission, the size, the groups you work with and the territory come from.
What you tell it
Seven questions, and only two are required: what the project is called and what you want to do. The other five – who it's for, how many people, how long it runs, how much you're going to ask for and what you've already done on this – aren't filler: the more specific you are, the fewer gaps are left. While you write, the call's criteria are in view alongside, which is what makes the draft tell what scores.
What you get back
The sections of the narrative already written – needs analysis, target population, measurable objectives, activities, methodology, resources, indicators, cross-cutting issues and continuity – put straight into the project narrative template editor, in Other resources, where you correct them and download them.
And on top of that, a list of things to check: the data we didn't have, left as a gap in square brackets, and everything it has taken for granted. That's the part that matters most.
This doesn't replace the real narrative. A model writes figures that are plausible and false, and they come out well written, which is exactly what makes them dangerous: go through the to-check list before you send anything. The draft doesn't use up credits today; the ones that get spent are the fit analysis ones and the match ones.